Fiesta 1
Roles
Web 2.0 Web 2.0 (a term coined by the O´Reilly Media Group according to David Tebbutt) does not refer to a whole new internet but to a change in the way information appears on the internet (Tebbutts, 1). Instead of basing web content on rigid rules and standards developed before the computer, Web 2.0 seeks a more present-centered approach. For example, folksonomies and wikis allow anyone to create content according to their knowledge and perspective instead of forcing them to conform to the standardized way of doing things. The technologies that make up Web 2.0 do not present static pictures or blocks of text, they invite users to interact and react. More than that, Web 2.0 refers to a new kind of culture or subculture growing out of this. To paraphrase one librarian, "libraries are no longer places to be quiet" (Schibsted). Collaborative work and sharing space is ever more in demand and if libraries at their fundamental roots represent free speech and open forums for dialogue then Web 2.0 represents a blossoming of those venues. Social software resides at the center of the Web 2.0 concept- applications that allow social interaction on just about all levels rather than just "being lectured to" by a static webpage. Blogs represent the most prominent form of this. The blog changes and most even allow users to comment on the topics posted. Yet, the blog can function as a reference and news source as well. Allowing realtime and near realtime dialogs to take place on various topics without having to gather in person or deliver something like a letter physically while also allowing all others to read your posts. RSS feeds, CSS valid XML webpages, mashups, etc. All of these Web 2.0 technologies and their proliferation mean that librarians and libraries must adapt and accommodate. Or does it? Mary Ellen Bates argues that librarians have often adopted new information technologies ahead of the curve thus helping to proliferate them and placing themselves on the cutting edge. So, the question then becomes not "how do we keep up with them?" but "how do we keep them up?" (Bates). This does not mean that libraries necessarily create technological trends but it does bring forth a valid point: how much of our constituency do we leave behind? In other words, looking forward to Web 2.0 and Library 2.0 (the library´s response and use of Web 2.0) does not mean leaving more traditional technologies behind. User information needs and styles for obtaining information will remain varied and so should library services. It also means that we should take the time to catch ourselves up. The title of Marshall Breeding´s article Web 2.0? Let´s get to Web 1.0 first nearly says it all. Breeding argues that, yes, Web 2.0 is coming and should be looked at but it will all be meaningless unless the technology base supports it. Computers need to support XML, CSS, etc. if they are to handle Web 2.0 efficiently. This means more than just efficiency, too: Tebbutts made the point that "unless library users get the same quality of engagement they are used to from their internet-connected PCs, they will drift away and libraries will become marginalised" (Tebbutts, 15). So, the message seems clear: we must keep up with new technologies while keeping up our users but we must also make sure that the users keep up with us or become disenfranchised.
Technology Initially tried OpenOffice.org´s Writer but did not want to take the time to download and install the X11 software I need for my Mac. Frankly, I am squeamish about adding such developer-type software to my computer. I may try it in the future when I have more time to figure out what I am doing with it. So, I tried ThinkFree, the online word processing application. With your free registration you get 1 GB of online file space to save your documents. It also allows you to create spreadsheets and presentations all compatible with MS Office applications. The greatest advantage of this kind of service is that you can access your files from any computer connected to the internet rather than relying on storage devices and email attachments. You can also easily share files with others for review or delivery. You can even publish a document to have it accessible like a web page. Very useful and not institution based. Both Ball State and Indiana University have their own versions of ThinkFree as far as file storage goes: iLocker and Oncourse CL Resources, respectively. Neither of these services offers word processing nor linking to weblogs or other features offered by ThinkFree but the file storage and sharing are there. The test file I created worked flawlessly when opening it in my Word application on my Mac. It is not a Word document- that is, I created it and saved it entirely in ThinkFree.com. Wonderful stuff. This could easily be used in a learning environment to facilitate writing and file sharing without requiring anyone to buy software or storage. I can see immediate uses for distance education and online courses. Whole classes might be able to create a single log in and then do all of their work from that single account so that assignments are always available in the same place. In effect, if handled correctly, it could be used as a free form of OnCourse. Just as the example in the description for step 4 said, much of the philosophy about software is beginning to change. It may seem that I merely stole the topic from this portion of Fiesta 1 but, honestly, I wanted to try out the alternative word processors because, as I mentioned in the previous section, I do not like Word and am always looking for something else.
ThinkFree.com and Web 2.0
Works cited Alexander, Bryan. Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review 41(2). Available online: http://www.educause.edu/apps/er/erm06/erm0621.asp?bhcp=1 Bates, Mary Ellen. 2006. Cutting edge or over the edge? EContent 29(5): 31. Breeding, Marshall. 2006. Web 2.0? Let’s get to Web 1.0 first. Computers in Libraries 26(5): 30-33. Prensky, Marc. 2001. Digital native digital immigrant. On the Horizon 9(5): 1-6. Available online: href="http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf Schibsted, Evantheia. 2005. Way beyond fuddy-duddy. Edutopia October. Available online: http://www.edutopia.org/magazine/ed1article.php?id=Art_1354&issue=oct_05# Tebbutts, David. 2006. Playing a new service game. Information World Review 222: 13-15. |
website created by: kevin e. brooks | email kevin at: kbrooks2@bsu.edu | updated: 17 November 2006 |